Appellant’s loan to appellee matches the term an attraction-hit financing under Roentgen

Appellant’s loan to appellee matches the term an attraction-hit financing under Roentgen

New arrangement conveys your debt because the dominating number, and notice was computed centered the principal harmony a good each and every day, according to the definition of “interest-influence loan” inside Roentgen

<¶>When statutory language is unambiguous, we will apply it as written, without resort to additional rules of statutory interpretation or considerations of public policy. Zumwalde v. Madeira & Indian Hill Joint Fire Dist., 128 Ohio St.3d 492, 2011–Ohio–1603, 946 N.E.2d 748, ¶ 23–24, 26. We biguous language only when a definitive meaning proves elusive, despite a thorough and objective examination of the statutory language. State v. Porterfield, 106 Ohio St.3d 5, 2005–Ohio–3095, 829 N.E.2d 690, ¶ 11. “Otherwise, allegations of ambiguity become self-fulfilling.” Id.

<¶>The appellate-court majority found the statutory definition of “interest-bearing loan”-and specifically the requirement that “interest is computed, charged, and collected on unpaid principal balances outstanding from time to time”-ambiguous:

C. (F) isn’t ambiguous, one to “occasionally” modifies “a fantastic,” and that a keen “interest-impact financing” shouldn’t have to need numerous installment payments

According to [appellant], “sometimes” modifies “outstanding dominating stability the[,]” and you will, ergo, financing might be desire-influence even if it absolutely was collected in a single repayment. Yet not, “sometimes” you may just as easily customize “calculated, charged, and gathered [,]” which will wanted attention to be gathered from inside the multiple installments. Get a hold of R.C. (F). This means that, brand new statute was unknown.

<¶>In determining whether a statute is ambiguous, we objectively and thoroughly examine the statute, consider each provision in context, and apply ordinary rules of grammar. Porterfield at ¶ 11, 829 N.E.2d 690, citing Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 100 Ohio St.3d 216, 2003–Ohio–5849, 797 N.E.2d 1256, ¶ 11; Hedges v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 109 Ohio St.3d 70, 2006–Ohio–1926, 846 N.E.2d 16, ¶ 24. When we do that here, we discern no ambiguity in R.C. (F).

<¶>It is an accepted rule of construction that in the absence of an expressed contrary intention, referential and qualifying words and phrases refer solely to the last antecedent. Hedges at ¶ 24. Applying that rule, the phrase “from time to time” is an adverbial phrase that modifies the antecedent adjective “outstanding,” which in turn modifies “unpaid principal balances.” The appellate-court majority states that the phrase “from time to time” may also be read as modifying the earlier verbs “computed, charged, and collected,” and, therefore requires that a lender collect interest at different times and thus in multiple installments. That reading, however, not only imposes a forced construction on the statute, but also ignores this accepted rule of construction. Had the General Assembly intended to require multiple installments for interest-bearing loans, it could have rearranged the statutory language in R.C. (F) to provide that “interest is computed, charged, and collected from time to time on unpaid principal balances outstanding,” but that is not how the enacted language is organized, and we may not rewrite the statute in that manner. The General Assembly could also have included a separate provision in the MLA that specifically requires that interest-bearing loans be repayable in multiple installments, just as it did with precomputed loans by requiring monthly installments. See R.C. (D)(1). Again, it did not do so. Reading the statute according to the natural and most obvious import of the statutory language, we conclude that R.

Your pledge to spend all of us $ (the primary Level of this financing) and additionally desire at a consistent level of twenty five% yearly for the prominent a fantastic into the go out a great out of the fresh time of the Customers Contract up to paid in full. Attention are going to be calculated everyday upon the principal harmony a great from the utilizing the easy focus approach, and in case good 365–go out 12 months.

C. (F). Likewise, the fresh new computation of great interest is actually similar to the conditions appropriate so you’re able to interest-affect MLA fund lower than R.C. (C).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.